Abstract

Introduction: Given the wide utilization of Chinese herbal injections in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), this network meta-analysis (NMA) was devised to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of different Chinese herbal injections combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) against NPC. Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were retrieved from seven electronic databases from the date of database establishment to October 5, 2020. Study selection and data extraction conformed to a priori criteria. Focusing on clinical effective rate, performance status, grade ≥3 oral mucositis, nausea and vomiting, leukopenia, and thrombopenia, this NMA was performed with Review Manager 5.3.5, Stata 13.1, WinBUGS 1.4.3, and R 4.0.3 software. Results: Ten inventions from 37 RCTs involving 2,581 participants with NPC that evaluated the clinical effective rate, nausea and vomiting, leukopenia, thrombopenia, and grade ≥3 oral mucositis were included. Compared with CCRT alone, Elemene injection and Compound Kushen injection were associated with significantly improved clinical effective rates, and Elemene injection plus CCRT had the highest probability in terms of clinical effective rate (78.07%) compared with the other interventions. Shenqifuzheng injection, Xiaoaiping injection, and Shenmai injection ranked the best in terms of performance status (79.02%), nausea and vomiting (86.35%), and grade ≥3 oral mucositis (78.14%) when combined with CCRT. Kangai injection combined with CCRT ranked ahead of the other injections in terms of leukopenia (90.80%) and thrombopenia (91.04%), and had a better impact on improving performance status and reducing leukopenia, thrombopenia, grade ≥3 oral mucositis, and nausea and vomiting in the multidimensional cluster analysis. Conclusion: Current clinical evidence indicates that Elemene injection combined with CCRT has the best clinical effective rate and that Kangai injection might have a comprehensively better impact on improving performance status and reducing adverse reactions against NPC. Additionally, due to the limitations of this NMA, more multicenter, high-quality, and head-to-head RCTs are needed to properly support our findings.

Highlights

  • Given the wide utilization of Chinese herbal injections in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), this network meta-analysis (NMA) was devised to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of different Chinese herbal injections combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) against NPC

  • The interventions of the 37 studies were Chinese herbal injections (CHIs) plus CCRT, including nine kinds of CHIs, namely, Compound Kushen injection, Aidi injection, Shenqifuzheng injection, Kangai injection, Kanglaite injection, Shengmai injection, Elemene injection, Xiaoaiping injection, and Shenmai injection; the numbers of Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) related to these medicines were 12, 6, 6, 2, 1, 2, 4, 3, and 1, respectively

  • Compound Kushen injection and Elemene injection combined with CCRT were significantly more effective than CCRT alone

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Given the wide utilization of Chinese herbal injections in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), this network meta-analysis (NMA) was devised to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of different Chinese herbal injections combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) against NPC. For locoregionally advanced NPC, guidelines of head and neck cancers (version 2.2020) from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommend a combination of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with either induction or adjuvant chemotherapy based on patient characteristics (Pfister et al, 2020). Patients with NPC have significant survival benefits under current medical conditions, the adverse reactions (ARs) caused by radiotherapy and chemotherapy cannot be ignored (Xiao et al, 2011). Toxic effects such as leukopenia, nausea and vomiting, and other ARs reduce patients’ quality of life and may even lead to treatment incompletion (Frikha et al, 2018)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call