Abstract

Influences of three typical vortex generators on flow pattern and ensuing heat transfer augmentation were investigated and compared at similar Re and swirl numbers inlet conditions. Studied swirlers such as propeller swirlers, jet-type swirlers, and rotating honeycombs were installed at the pipe inlet. Reynolds number ranges from 10000 to 30000. Swirlers were set on the swirl numbers 1.4, 0.89, and 0.52, which were obtained by propellers. This study has been carried out under uniform heat flux condition and air was employed as the working fluid. The obtained results provide the individual effects of each swirler configuration on mean flow and turbulence distribution as well as on enhancement of heat transfer. Considering S=1.4, jet-type swirlers pointed 133 per cent Nu enhancement compared to axial flow, whereas propellers and rotating honeycombs approached 105 per cent and 79 per cent, respectively. For S=0.89, relative treatment has been changed and propellers with 70 per cent Nu augmentation demonstrated tip-top performance behind of which other swirlers lined. By decreasing the swirl number, approximately closer heat performances were represented from all swirler configurations. Comparison of the results of various swirlers exhibited that Re and swirl numbers are not generally sufficient to determine the swirling flow characteristics and each swirler confirms an individual flow quality.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.