Abstract

Several experimental methods have been proposed for consolidation test such as: constant loading rate, constant gradient and constant rate of strain (CRS). Unfortunately, there are no unique criteria for performing the CRS consolidation test. Also, there are considerable differences among the standards proposed for the test. In the present paper, authors have tried to find the reasons for differences among standards, by studying the basic assumptions made on the characteristics of the pore water flow during consolidation process. In the course of study, CRS consolidation tests were carried out under different strain rates on remolded samples. The results of the tests have indicated that the Darcy’s law is not valid throughout the CRS test and therefore, any consolidation equation based on Darcy’s law would not provide accurate results. The results of the current experiments also showed that with regard to the applied strain rates, there are three different flow regimes governing the process named as: pre-linear (non-Darcy flow), linear (Darcy flow) and post-linear (non-Darcy flow). Experimental results also showed that distinction between boundaries of linear and nonlinear flow is possible from the excess pore pressure developed during the tests.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call