Investigation on the accuracy of field widths and the quantitative relationship with energy variations for dynamic jaws helical tomotherapy.

Abstract

TomoEDGE is an advanced technology for TomoTherapy treatment delivery by introducing a sliding-window dynamic jaw motion. The front and back jaws move independently at the start and end of a target volume along the longitudinal couch direction to reduce the undesired dose to the normal tissues. The accuracy of field width is essential to treatment delivery in this regard. The purpose of this work was to analyze the performance of dynamic jaws on helical tomotherapy and investigate the relationship with energy variation. The Tomotherapy-Quality-Assurance (TQA) Dynamic Field Width procedure was performed monthly across three tomotherapy machines. All field widths were analyzed, especially the FWHM of the 10mm field width. Field width measurements were compared with the ratio of Percentage Depth Dose at 20 and 10cm to render the value of correlation. Changes in beam FWHM and energy were further discussed. Two-year data were collected for this purpose. On average, measured field widths in each unit agreed within 1% tolerance recommendation stated. The average absolute difference between reference and measured FWs in each unit was approximately 0.07mm. An increase of 1.5% in the FW of the 10mm nominal beam width was correlated with a 1% increase in PDD20,10 ratio, implying a positive correlation between the two factors (p<0.002). A positive correlation between nominal 10mm FW and PDD20,10 was observed. In the case that the PDD20,10 marginally passes the QA tests, users are recommended to consider further verification on Dynamic Jaws to ensure the smallest field width to be within tolerance, which is essential to maintain effective treatment in TomoEDGE system. Since the regression of this study was a single-factor model, other confounding factors such as the focal spot size of linear accelerator should also be considered when evaluating the machine status.