Abstract

Pore structure is the key factor to control the quality and fluid flow of ultra-tight reservoir. The relationship between rock types, pore types, and pore sizes of ultra-tight sandstone reservoirs was identified by observing microscopic characteristics under a polarizing microscope and scanning electron microscope (SEM) and quantitively assessed using high-pressure mercury intrusion (HPMI) and fractal theory. By a comparative analysis of lithic sandstone and feldspar lithic sandstone reservoirs of Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation of the Northern Sichuan Basin, we found that the pore type of the ultra-tight sandstone reservoir was linked to the rock type. Argillaceous lithic sandstone minly generates fracture pores, while fine-grained lithic sandstone and feldspar lithic sandstone formed dissolved pores by dissolution of carbonate cement, rock debris, and feldspar particles. Meanwhile, clay minerals such as kaolinite and chlorite in the reservoir possess pores between clay platelets and intraplatelet pores within clay aggregates, which are important pore types for ultra–tight sandstone reservoirs. A method to divided intervals of pore size distribution was proposed using high-pressure mercury intrusion (HPMI), and three intervals of pore diameter distribution were observed: 10–40 nm, 40 nm–1 μm, and 1–100 μm, which is largely controlled by pore type. The reservoir with only fracture pores is a one–interval reservoir with pore diameter in the range of 1–100 μm, while the reservoirs with dissolved pores and clay mineral-related pores have the above three intervals. Meanwhile, the fractal of pores in different scale range is different, and the larger the pore size, the stronger is the reservoir heterogeneity. A treelike pore structure model can be utilized to define pore development features in ultra–tight sandstone reservoirs. Micron–scale pores with diameters of 1–100 μm is mostly made up of fractures, cement and particle dissolution pores. However, nano–scale pores in the range of 40 nm–1 μm and 10–40 nm are predominantly pores formed between clay platelets and intraplatelet pores within clay aggregates, respectively.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call