Investigation on labile organic carbons in soils developed from limestone and sandstone in karst areas of southwest China

Abstract

Although labile soil organic carbons (LSOC) represent only a small part of soil organic carbon (SOC), they are an important source of energy for the belowground portion of the ecosystem and play a crucial role regarding changes in the quality of soil organic matter (SOM). This study measured and compared the content of LSOC and SOC in limestone soil (developed from limestone) and sandstone soil (developed from sandstone) in the karstic area of southwest China to better understand the impacts of different soil types on LSOC (water-extractable and readily oxidizable organic carbon) and evaluate the existence of a possible relationship between LSOC and SOC in the soil. The results demonstrated that the amounts of SOC, soil readily oxidizable carbon (SROC), and soil water-extractable organic carbon (WEOC) (hot-water extractable organic carbon (hot-WEOC) and cold-water extractable organic carbon (cold-WEOC)) were the highest in the surface soil and decreased with increasing depth in both types of soil profiles. In addition, the content of SOC and LSOC were significantly higher in the limestone soil profiles than those in the sandstone soil profiles. This may be as a result of the occurrence of higher pH values and higher content of calcium, magnesium, and clay minerals in the limestone soil than in the sandstone soil. The proportions of WEOC in total SOC extracted at 25°C and 70°C in the sandstone soil profiles displayed higher average values of 0.040% and 0.527%, respectively, whereas the limestone soil profiles displayed lower average values of 0.015% and 0.255% for the WEOC extracted at 25°C and 70°C, respectively. Regarding the SROC content, both soil profiles showed higher values than WEOC content, ranging from 39.4%–55.2%. The results also showed that for the two types of soils significant correlations were found between samples of SROC, WEOC, and SOC (P < 0.01). Among the LSOC, the hot-WEOC showed clear differences between different soil types, and significant relationships were observed for not only SOC but also SROC. The correlation coefficients between hot-WEOC and SOC or SROC were higher than those between cold-WEOC and SOC or SROC. This study, therefore, suggests that hot-WEOC could be a useful indicator of changes in the quality of SOM in different soil types.