Abstract
Aim: To analyse current UK practice for investigation of patients with visible haematuria (VH) or non-visible haematuria (NVH) who meet referral criteria according to National Institute of Clinical Excellence referral guidelines for suspected cancer. Patients and methods: Questionnaires were sent to 131 trusts. Data collected included demographics, conformity with NICE improving outcomes in urological cancer guidelines, standard first line investigations into VH and NVH and criteria for second line investigations. Results: Seventy-two trusts (55%) responded from 15 deaneries including 48 cancer centres. Almost two-thirds (63.9%) provide a one-stop service. First line investigations into VH varied considerably: 82% of trusts undertake urine tests (cytology 43.0%); three-quarters perform blood tests (prostate-specific antigen 54.2%); all conduct varying radiological imaging of the upper tracts; 95.8% of patients had flexible cystoscopy. Forty per cent of trusts’ first line investigations differ for NVH. Triple phase computed tomography-urogram is not routinely undertaken. Of the trusts, 55.5% perform second line investigations for VH and 55.5% for recurrent VH including computed tomography-urogram or retrograde studies; 20.5% perform non-contrast helical computed tomography scan of the kidneys, ureters and bladder or urine cytology for NVH if the history is indicative. Conclusion: Across trusts, there are wide variations in the regimes for investigation of haematuria. Development of an evidence based guideline to standardise practice across the National Health Service for haematuria referrals is required to abolish the postcode lottery system.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.