Abstract

Appropriate triage is an important component of patient management in emergency departments. The risk scoring system used for triage purposes in emergency departments should be obtained quickly and based on parameters directly related to prognosis. To investigate the success of the Rapid Emergency Medicine Score (REMS) and Rapid Acute Physiology Score (RAPS) as triage scoring systems and the Mortality Probability Model (MPM II0) as an intensive care scoring system in identifying critical patients visited to the emergency department (ED) triage and predicting mortality, and to evaluate their superiority over each other, if any. This research was planned as a single-center and prospectively. The data of the study were obtained by screening the medical records of all patients who presented to the ED triage between January 1, 2020 and January 31, 2020. Patients under the age of 18years, those with missing information in their files and pregnant women were not included in the study. Only the patients for whom the REMS, RAPS, and MPM II0 scores could be calculated were included in the sample. After excluding the patients who did not meet the inclusion criteria, the study was completed with 12,210 patients. The mean age of these patients was 44.7 ± 18.7years, and 47.3% were male. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve values for the prediction of 24-h, 30-day, 90-day, and 180-day mortality were determined as 0.979, 0.921, 0.904, and 0.897, respectively, for REMS; 0.929, 0.778, 0.75, and 0.725, respectively, for RAPS; and 0.925, 0.888, 0.866, and 0.861, respectively, for MPM II0. In this study, it was concluded that the REMS score was superior to the MPM II0 and RAPS scores in predicting the short-term and long-term mortality status of patients and determining the discharge and hospitalization status of the patients.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call