Abstract
In this study, the photo fermentative H2 production of Rhodobacter sphaeroides KCTC 1434 was investigated using acetate, propionate and butyrate under argon and nitrogen headspace gases. The highest H2 yield and Substrate Conversion Efficiency (SCE) were observed from butyrate (8.84 mol H2/mol butyrate consumed, 88.42% SCE) and propionate (6.10 mol H2/mol propionate consumed, 87.16% SCE) under Ar headspace. Utilization of acetate was associated with low H2 evolution, high biomass yield and high final pH, which suggest that acetate uptake by the strain involves a biosynthetic pathway that competes with H2 production. The use of N2 in sparging resulted to a decreased H2 productivity in propionate (0.49 mol H2/mol propionate consumed, 7.01% SCE) and butyrate (1.22 mol H2/mol butyrate consumed, 1.04% SCE) and was accompanied with high biomass yield and radical pH increase in all acids. High H2 generation had shown to improve acid consumption rate. The use of the three acids in a mixed substrate resulted to a drastic pH rise and lower H2 generation. This suggests that a more refined culture condition such as additional control of pH during fermentation must be kept to enhance the H2 productivity. Overall, the study provided a background on the H2 production using R. sphaeroides KCTC 1434 which might be a good co-culture candidate because of its high SCE on butyrate and propionate.
Highlights
In the recent years, the issue of energy security and environmental pollution has gained considerable attention
While acetate evolved a minimal amount of H2 regardless of the headspace gas used, the Ar-sparged propionate and butyrate reactors gave H2 volumes that were 24.64 and 23.17 times higher than their N2- sparged counterparts
H2 production of R. sphaeroides Korean Collection for Type Culture (KCTC) 1434 was investigated under Ar and N2 headspace
Summary
The issue of energy security and environmental pollution has gained considerable attention. Various scientific endeavors have been directed at generating petroleum-independent and low-carbon technologies as the global industry hopes to transition to a sustainable bio-based economy (Golden and Handfield, 2014; Lee, 2016). H2 has been known as a clean and renewable energy carrier, a promising alternative to fossil fuels. It does not evolve CO2 during combustion and has an energy yield (122 kJ/g) that is 2.75 times greater than any hydrocarbon fuels (Kapdan and Kargi, 2006). With a levelized cost of energy at USD 2-3/kg from 2008 to 2042, biohydrogen can compete with the cost of conventional fossil fuel in the global market (Lee, 2016)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.