Investigation of the multidimensional determinants of negative nutrition coping strategies and tradeoffs in adults accessing food relief: A secondary data analysis.

Abstract

Multidimensional determinants influence negative nutrition coping strategies and tradeoffs in households accessing food relief. This study examined coping strategies and tradeoffs at different levels of food insecurity from individuals accessing food relief and how these behaviors relate to experience-based food insecurity dimensions and subpopulations at risk. A secondary analysis of cross-sectional data from the Sunshine State Hunger Survey (SSHS) was conducted. The SSHS was a paper-based, 48-question survey, including questions about coping strategies and tradeoffs, use of food assistance programs, and food security. Out of 616 respondents who completed the survey, 73.9% identified as food insecure while 19.1%, as food secure. The average age of participants was 59.6 years and 62.6% were female. One-way analysis of variance indicated increases in negative nutrition coping strategies and tradeoffs with increasing levels of food insecurity status. The most common coping strategy reported by those with very low food security was "Eating less so children or others have enough food," while the most common tradeoff was "Trading off medicine or medical care for food." Two-step cluster analysis identified homogeneous subgroups by behavior and demographic characteristics: (1) late adult worriers, (2) middle adult traders, and (3) middle/late adult copers. Identifying coping strategies and tradeoffs used by participants accessing food relief is a multidimensional approach to addressing determinants of food insecurity. Future research on conceptual pathways is warranted to see if experience-based food insecurity variables help to understand relationships across a continuum, including barriers and influencers.