Abstract
In a wearable robot arm, the minimum joint configuration and link length must be considered to avoid increasing the burden on the user. This work investigated how the joint configuration, length of arm links, and mounting position of a wearable robot arm affect the cooperative and invasive workspaces of the overall workspace. We considered the joint configurations and link lengths of passive and active joints in our proposed wearable robot arm, which is called the Assist Oriented Arm (AOA). In addition, we comprehensively studied the position of the arm on the user. As a result, three locations around the shoulders and two around the waist were chosen as potential mounting sites. Furthermore, we evaluated the weight burden when the user mounted the wearable robot arm at those positions.
Highlights
IntroductionPosition of a Wearable Robot Arm. Robotics 2022, 11, 19
We considered the joint configuration, which is wider in the work envelope of the wearable robot arm within the user’s workspace
In contrast to an industrial robot arm, a wearable robot arm does not need all of its joints to be controlled by actuators
Summary
Position of a Wearable Robot Arm. Robotics 2022, 11, 19. Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
