Abstract

Specific resistance (SRaw) measurements in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients may be performed by panting or tidal breathing. The aim of this study was to compare how breathing frequency affected SRaw in COPD and compare different tangent plotting methods. Fifteen COPD patients participated. Three protocols were performed: tidal 1 - spontaneous tidal breathing; tidal 2 - tidal breathing with a flow of ±1 L/sec; panting - 60 breaths per min. Effective (SReff), total (SRtot), ±0.5 L/s (SR0.5), and mid (SRmid) specific resistance were assessed. The tidal breathing protocols provided similar results. Panting resulted in higher SReff (p = 0.0002) and SRtot (p < 0.0001) versus tidal breathing, but not SR0.5 or SRmid. Breathing frequency did not affect intra-test variance. SReff and SRtot measurements were similar, and were higher than SR0.5, during tidal breathing (p = 0.0014 and p < 0.0001 respectively) and panting (p = 0.0179 and p < 0.0001 respectively). SRtot was higher than SRmid during tidal breathing (p < 0.0001) and panting (p < 0.0001). Intra-test variance of SReff and SRtot were similar and showed the lowest percent coefficient of variation during both tidal breathing and panting. Panting and tidal breathing manoeuvres are not interchangeable in COPD patients. Panting widens the clubbing in the SRaw loop. SR0.5 and SRmid may underestimate abnormal physiology in COPD.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.