Abstract

Availability, accuracy and relevance of field data are essential for developing a reliable simulation model. Large scale simulation models in particular require data from many sources and in great detail. Considering the sheer size of many simulation models used in practice, collecting all the required data is both costly and time-consuming, and in many cases even impossible. Therefore a trade-off is usually made in terms of the amount of data collected or the number of selected data collection locations used for the calibration and validation process. The fundamental question addressed in this paper is the following: what is the marginal gain in using an additional type of field data for the calibration and validation process? Using a case study where the calibration and validation of a test network is performed under different scenarios of available data types, and the results are compared in hindsight. The results indicate that only traffic flow and travel time data would suffice for the calibration and validation process, and that the marginal benefit of acquiring additional data such as, queue length, in this case study, is likely to be insignificant.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.