Abstract
We rigorously investigate the multifaceted effects of financial regulation and supervision on bank stability using panel data for 2210 banks across 47 European countries over the period 2000–2016. The CAMELS rating system is applied to quantile regressions. We find that greater capital regulation is positively associated with bank stability, whilst tighter restrictions, deposit insurance and excess of supervision appear to exert an adverse effect on bank stability. These effects are more pronounced among banks at a higher level of stability. It also appears that commercial banks, smaller banks and banks in emerging countries are relatively sensitive to regulatory shocks.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
