Investigation of the Effect of Mobile and Immobile Regions on Fat Graft Viability: An Experimental Study in a New Model.

Abstract

Fat grafts are widely used in plastic, aesthetic and reconstructive surgery. Their unpredictable resorption is their main disadvantage. A review of the literature shows that there is a lack of research on the effect of mobile and immobile regions on fat graft survival in fat graft applications. Our aim was to investigate the relationship of fat graft survival with mobile and immobile region in a new experimental model. Twenty-four male Wistar albino rats were randomly divided into two groups (n=12). Fat grafts were harvested from the right inguinal region of the rat. In Group 1, the fat graft was placed in the subcutaneous pouch formed in the scalp region of the rat. In Group 2, fat grafts were placed in the pouch formed in the posterior cervical region of the rat. At the end of 6weeks, the weights and histopathology of the fat grafts were evaluated. Histopathological examinations were performed in a blinded fashion. The weights of the fat grafts were found to be higher in Group 1. At the same time, histopathological examinations showed that vascular density was higher in Group 1. There was no statistically significant difference in other histopathological examinations. The mobile and immobile areas may have different effects on the survival of transplanted fat grafts. Sliding movement between muscle and skin in the mobile zone puts stress on the fat graft. In our study, the mobile site was shown to have a negative effect on the vascularity of the fat graft. It was observed that the vascular density was higher in the fat graft placed in the immobilised area. Further studies on the increase in vascularity can be carried out using the new experimental model we have created. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews, and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies, and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .