Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to explore at what stage of a company’s life cycle the theory of market timing has explained debt. Drawing on a unified conceptual framework of market timing theory, the authors scrutinize the impact of life cycle and ownership structure on the market condition. Design/methodology/approach Based on a sample of 24 Tunisian companies listed on the stock exchange and 100 French firms listed on the CAC All-Tradable on a 10-year period, this paper grounded the market timing theory and attempted to clear the relation between ownership structure, life cycle of the firm and market timing theory by statistical analysis. Findings The findings of panel data modeling indicate that when the life cycle was used as an explanatory variable, it was found that the variable reflecting the market timing is not significant in either context; it means that no significant support is found in the theory of market timing in both countries. Whereas when the life cycle was used as a dummy variable, it was found that the life cycle has an impact on debt only in the Tunisian context. Practical implications This study has several important implications for researchers and practitioners. The findings reported here clarify the strength of the impact of life cycle on the market timing, when it explains the debt in the two contexts and the impact of ownership structure such as the managerial ownership and concentration of capital on debt. Originality/value This study contributes to examine the theory of debt in different phases of life cycle. Focused on the case of Tunisian and French firms, this study is unique and valuable.

Highlights

  • The pecking order theory based on the asymmetry of information suggests that the companies do not have leverage targets

  • The findings reported here clarify the strength of the impact of life cycle on the market timing, when it explains the debt in the two contexts and the impact of ownership structure such as the managerial ownership and concentration of capital on debt

  • The nonsignificance of the MTB timing (MTBtim) (À1) in the Tunisian and French context is similar to the results found in Japan where Mahajan and Tartaroglu (2008) explain this by a slowdown in tapping the equity market which leads to a conclusion that the relationship between leverage and MTBtim in Japan cannot be attributed to market timing

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The pecking order theory based on the asymmetry of information suggests that the companies do not have leverage targets. They use debt as one last resort when retained. Published in Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship. The full terms of this licence may be seen at http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.