Investigation of stage‐discharge model performance for streamflow estimating: A case study of the Gono River, Japan

Abstract

AbstractIn water resource studies, long‐term measurements of river streamflow are essential. They allow us to observe trends and natural cycles and are prerequisites for hydraulic and hydrology models. This paper presents a new application of the stage‐discharge rating curve model introduced by Maghrebi et al. (2016) to estimate continuous streamflow along the Gono River, Japan. The proposed method, named single stage‐discharge (SSD) method, needs only one observed data to estimate the continuous streamflow. However, other similar methods require more than one observational data to fit the curve. The results of the discharge estimation by the SSD are compared with the improved fluvial acoustic tomography system (FATS), conventional rating curve (RC), and flow‐area rating curve (FARC). Some statistical indicators, such as the coefficient of determination (R2), root mean square error (RMSE), percent bias (PBAIS), mean absolute error (MAE), and Kling‐Gupta efficiency (KGE), are used to assess the performance of the proposed model. ADCP data are used as a benchmark for comparing four studied models. As a result of the comparison, the SSD method outperformed of FATS method. Also, the three studied RC methods were highly accurate at estimating streamflow if all observed data were used in calibration. However, if the observed data in calibration was reduced, the SSD method by R2 = 0.99, RMSE = 2.83 (m3/s), PBIAS = 0.715(%), MAE = 2.30 (m3/s), and KGE = 0.972 showed the best performance compared to other methods. It can be summarized that the SSD method is the feasible method in the data‐scarce region and delivers a strong potential for streamflow estimation.