Abstract

Three major geometric factors which are likely to influence theoretical interpretation of planetary polarization measurements, viz., observer—planet distance, horizontal inhomogeneity of planetary disk, and deviation from a spherical body, are investigated. The distance effect is examined for regional as well as global polarizations. For convenience of analysis, the expressions for zenith and azimuth angles of incident and emergent light appropriate for a snap-shot observation are derived as explicit functions of distance between observer and planet. Sample computations for Venus indicate that regional polarization near the planetary limb is significantly affected by the observer's distance. This effect should be particularly noticeable when an observation is made at a phase angle around which the single scattering polarization of atmospheric scattering agents exhibits a steep variation. The global polarization at large phase angles (measured at disk-center) is gradually moved toward smaller phase angles, as the observer approaches the planet. Any narrow polarization features such as rainbow and glory at small phase angles are heavily smoothed out. The effects of horizontal inhomogeneity are investigated with a planetary disk having highly polarizing regions at high latitudes. Comparison of theoretical global polarization computed for such a disk with the Pioneer Venus OCPP measurements shows a possible change in cloud-haze stratification approximately at 50° latitude, consistent with other imaging observations. An approximate analytical representation of residual polarization at zero phase angle is then derived to compare to the numerical results for Venus. An attempt is also made to explain the relatively large magnitude of residual polarization observed on Jupiter. Finally, to study the effects of nonsphericity of planetary body, the global polarizations are computed for a spheroidal planet. The global polarization tends to increase as the planet's oblateness increases. However, for Jupiter and Saturn, such effect may be of secondary importance.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call