Abstract
Evaluation of the liquefaction potential of a liquefaction-prone area is important for geotechnical earthquake engineering, both for assessment for site selection and for planning and new constructions. The liquefaction potential index for the city of Duzce in northwestern Turkey using the empirical relationships between the Standard Penetration Test (SPT) and the Shear Wave Velocity Test (VS) was investigated in this study. After,VSvalues based on SPT blow counts (N) were obtained from the alluvial soils in the city of Duzce. The liquefaction potential indexes of the soils were determined using the empirical relationships between the Standard Penetration Test (SPT) and the Shear Wave Velocity Test (VS) calculating for a probable earthquake ofMW=7.2. In the result of the study, the liquefaction potential index (LPI) values were interpreted and compared evaluating the SPTNblow count values obtained from the study area. Based on the empirical relationships assumed for the soils, it was observed that there was not a perfect agreement between the results of the two methods. The liquefaction potential index values using the SPTNblow counts were found to be lower than those of theVSmethod.
Highlights
The liquefaction resistance of soils can be evaluated using laboratory tests such as the cyclic simple shear and cyclic triaxial and cyclic torsional shear tests
The occurrence of liquefaction in soils is often evaluated using the simplified procedure originally developed and proposed by Seed and Idriss [1] based on the Standard Penetration Test (SPT) blow counts correlated with the cyclic stress ratio (CSR), a parameter representing the seismic loading on the soil
This study investigated two field methods used to evaluate the liquefaction potential of soils, the Standard Penetration Test (SPT) and the Shear Wave Velocity Test (VS), based on the empirical relationships between them
Summary
The liquefaction resistance of soils can be evaluated using laboratory tests such as the cyclic simple shear and cyclic triaxial and cyclic torsional shear tests. The occurrence of liquefaction in soils is often evaluated using the simplified procedure originally developed and proposed by Seed and Idriss [1] based on the SPT blow counts correlated with the cyclic stress ratio (CSR), a parameter representing the seismic loading on the soil. This procedure has undergone several revisions and updates [2,3,4]. The liquefaction potential indexes (LPI) for both aforementioned methods were calculated using the procedure of Iwasaki et al [23]
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have