Abstract

Cone Penetration Test or CPT is one of soil investigation which is used to determine the mechanical properties of soil i.e., cone resistance and sleeve friction. Since several decades ago, CPT is often used as a common thread to determine the physical properties of soil such as soil unit weight of soil, soil behaviour type, etc. Thus, empirical approaches have been developed from various countries. However, these empirical approaches are not the same as the condition in Indonesia. Therefore, it is necessary to obtain and develop the suitable correlation for the type of cohesive soil. In this study, primary and secondary data were carried out from Gunung Anyar area. From statical analysis result, the regression shows less than 60% similarity of the model. In addition, the result of this study found that silt and clay soil types were found to dominate in Gunung Anyar area.

Highlights

  • In construction field, physical and mechanical properties of soil play an important role in evaluating the types and bearing capacity of soil

  • Cone Penetration Test (CPT) is a test that aims to measures the cone resistance and sleeve friction of soil

  • Primary data was obtained from direct testing in the field and laboratory and secondary data was obtained from soil investigation in Gunung Anyar area from several private companies

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Physical and mechanical properties of soil play an important role in evaluating the types and bearing capacity of soil. CPT is a test that aims to measures the cone resistance (qc) and sleeve friction (fs) of soil These values are well known as mechanical properties of soil and really important in designing civil construction. Robertson et al developed a chart to estimate the soil behaviour type based on the value between friction ratio (FR) and cone resistance (qc) (see Figure 1.). This chart can be used to determine the value of ߛ/ߛ௪ [1]. There are still many research that presented empirical approaches the correlation between unit weight of soil and cone resistance These empirical studies were designed with soil in another

12. Sand to clayey sand
Study Area
Data Collection
Data Processing
Result and Discussion
Soil Behaviour Type
Correlation Between Cone Resistance and Unit Weight of Soil
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.