Abstract

The number of studies regarding determining reading and writing strategies that students use and the effect of strategy training on skills development is quite abundant. However, no study has ever investigated whether there is a correlation between reading and writing strategies in terms of frequency of use. In spite of this, there have been several resources indicating that reading and writing skills are interrelated. Based on the assumption that this indication might possibly impact the use of strategies to some extent, current research aimed to determine the types of strategies used by first grade undergraduate students at a faculty of education together with their frequency of use and if there is a correlation between two scores. To conduct the research, 420 first-grade participants from various departments of Necatibey Faculty of Education, Balıkesir University were selected. As for the data collection, these students were administered a Reading Strategies Survey (RSS) developed by Karatay (2007) and a Writing Strategies Survey (WSS) developed by Ülper (2011). Related statistical analyses were conducted based on the data gathered from the scale, revealing that females used reading and writing strategies more often than males, and there was a moderate and positive correlation between the frequencies of the uses of writing and reading strategies. Apart from that, no difference was detected in terms of departments.

Highlights

  • The number of texts to read has been constantly increasing in recent years

  • Based on the assumption that this indication might possibly impact the use of strategies to some extent, current research aimed to determine the types of strategies used by first grade undergraduate students at a faculty of education together with their frequency of use and if there is a correlation between two scores

  • Aside from that, it was stated that writing strategies improve reading comprehension (Zsigmond, 2015); in addition, teaching reading strategies is the fundamental way of improving reading comprehension (Brand-Gruwel, Aarnoutse & van den Bos, 1998; Cain, 1999; Spörer, Brunstein & Kieschke, 2009; Muijselaar & de Jong, 2015)

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The number of texts to read has been constantly increasing in recent years. In addition, opportunities to produce written texts have been thriving in humankind’s favor. Reading and writing activities performed in educational environments have gained the attribution of educating the brain in terms of exploring the relationships and connections between thoughts and concepts Based on this insight, it is plausible to turn in the direction of training strategic readers and writers on every level ranging from primary to higher education (Graham, Harris, Kiuhara & Fishman, 2017). Aside from that, it was stated that writing strategies improve reading comprehension (Zsigmond, 2015); in addition, teaching reading strategies is the fundamental way of improving reading comprehension (Brand-Gruwel, Aarnoutse & van den Bos, 1998; Cain, 1999; Spörer, Brunstein & Kieschke, 2009; Muijselaar & de Jong, 2015) In this context, this is an indication that reading and writing skills complement and support each other as acknowledged over time. Is there a correlation between pre-service teachers’ frequency of use regarding reading and writing strategies?

Participants
FINDINGS AND INTERPRETATION
I question whether the content of
19. I use clues regarding the
27. I reread the text to increase
11. I edit the text in terms of content by
18. I evaluate and edit the text in terms of suitability to 7
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call