Abstract

Pathogen cell-free DNA (pcfDNA) in blood and urine is an attractive biomarker; however, the impact of preanalytical factors is not well understood. Blood and urine samples from healthy donors spiked with cfDNA from Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Salmonella enterica, Aspergillus fumigatus, and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and samples from tuberculosis patients were used to evaluate the impact of blood collection tube, urine preservative, processing delay, processing method, freezing and thawing, and sample volume on pcfDNA. The PCR cycle threshold (CT ) was used to measure amplifiable cfDNA. In spiked samples, the median CT values for M. tuberculosis, S. enterica, and EBV cfDNA were significantly lower in blood collected in K2EDTA tubes than those in Streck and PAXgene blood collection tubes, and they were was significantly lower in urine preserved with EDTA (EDTA-urine) than in urine preserved with Streck reagent (Streck-urine). Blood and urine samples from TB patients preserved with K2EDTA and Tris-EDTA, respectively, showed significantly lower median M. tuberculosisCT values than with the Streck blood collection tube and Streck urine preservative. Processing delay increased the median pathogen CT values for Streck and PAXgene but not K2EDTA blood samples and for urine preserved with Streck reagent but not EDTA. Double-spin compared with single-spin plasma separation increased the median pathogen CT regardless of blood collection tube. No differences were observed between whole urine and supernatant and between fresh and thawed plasma and urine after 24 weeks at -80°C. Larger plasma and urine volumes in contrived and patient samples showed a significantly lower median M. tuberculosisCT These findings suggest that large-volume single-spin K2EDTA-plasma and EDTA-whole urine with up to a 24-h processing delay may optimize pcfDNA detection.

Highlights

  • Pathogen cell-free DNA in blood and urine is an attractive biomarker; the impact of preanalytical factors is not well understood

  • A comparison of three urine preservatives using urine specimens from healthy donors spiked with pathogen cell-free DNA (cfDNA) showed significantly lower median pathogen cycle threshold (CT) values for 25 mM EDTA than with Streck urine preservative for all four pathogens at all time points for whole urine and/or urine supernatant, with the exception of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), which was significantly lower only after 6- and 24-h processing delays (Fig. 3 and Table S3)

  • Little is known about the impact of preanalytical factors, such as type of blood collection tube or urine preservative, processing delay, processing method, sample volume, and freezing and thawing, on the detection of pathogen cfDNA [23]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Pathogen cell-free DNA (pcfDNA) in blood and urine is an attractive biomarker; the impact of preanalytical factors is not well understood. Larger plasma and urine volumes in contrived and patient samples showed a significantly lower median M. tuberculosis CT These findings suggest that large-volume single-spin K2EDTA-plasma and EDTA-whole urine with up to a 24-h processing delay may optimize pcfDNA detection. The aim of this study was to use contrived and clinical samples to investigate the impact of preanalytical variables, such as type of blood collection tube or urine preservative, processing delay, processing method, freezing and thawing, and sample volume on pathogen cfDNA detection in plasma and urine

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.