Abstract

A flow injection on-line sorption preconcentration electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometric system for fully automatic determination of lead in water was investigated. The discrete non-flow-through nature of ETAAS, the limited capacity of the graphite tube and the relatively large volume of the knotted reactor (KR) are obstacles to overcome for the on-line coupling of the KR sorption preconcentration system with ETAAS. A new FI manifold has been developed with the aim of reducing the eluate volume and minimizing dispersion. The lead diethyldithiocarbamate complex was adsorbed on the inner walls of a knotted reactor made of PTFE tubing (100 cm long, 0.5 mm i.d.). After that, an air flow was introduced to remove the residual solution from the KR and the eluate delivery tube, then the adsorbed analyte chelate was quantitatively eluted into a delivery tube with 50 μl of ethanol. An air flow was used to propel the eluent from the eluent loop through the reactor and to introduce all the ethanolic eluate onto the platform of the transversely heated graphite tube atomizer, which was preheated to 80°C. With the use of the new FI manifold, the consumption of eluent was greatly reduced and dispersion was minimized. The adsorption efficiency was 58%, and the enhancement factor was 142 in the concentration range 0.01–0.05 μg l −1 Pb at a sample loading rate of 6.8 ml min −1 with 60 s preconcentration time. For the range 0.1–2.0 μg l −1 of Pb a loading rate of 3.0 ml min −1 and 30 s preconcentration time were chosen, resulting in an adsorption efficiency of 42% and an enhancement factor of 21, respectively. A detection limit (3σ) of 2.2 ng l −1 of lead was obtained using a sample loading rate of 6.8 ml min −1 and 60 s preconcentration. The relative standard deviation of the entire procedure was 4.9% at the 0.01 μg l −1 Pb level with a loading rate of 6.8 ml min −1 and 60 s preconcentration, and 2.9% at the 0.5 μg l −1 Pb level with a 3.0 ml min −1 loading rate and 30 s preconcentration. Efficient washing of the matrix from the reactor was critical, requiring the use of the standard addition method for seawater samples. The analytical results obtained for seawater and river water standard reference materials were in good agreement with the certified values.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call