Abstract

Hybrid-electric vehicles can achieve low fuel consumption and emission by optimal combination of electrical energy and internal combustion engine power. There are four main test method of energy consumption and emission for heavy-duty HEVs, including traditional engine bench test, powertrain test, HILS and chassis dynamometer test. The tradition engine operating conditions are distinguished from that in HEVs, which can’t reflect the performance of HEVs. Powertrain test can achieve braking energy regeneration, but need bulky installation on testbed. HILS test solves the problem that the engine test cycle is different from the actual operating condition on road and is cost-effective. However, it requires a lot of effort to monitor the HILS simulation input parameters and carry out vehicle validation. Chassis dynamometer test method can better reflect the real-road driving condition. But it is nearly impossible to test all different HEVs types on chassis dynamometer and the test cost is very expensive. By comparing different heavy-duty HEVs energy consumption and emission test methods, the advantages and disadvantages are identified, which provides guidance for the formulation of the next-stage standards of heavy-duty HEV, and promotes the healthy and orderly development of the HEV industry.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call