Abstract
Foreign policy is very important because it deals with relations between governments and international system. So this study believes that a great part of foreign policy is developed under individual variables and inferences so the best choice to prove the argument would be realism new classic. It’ due to in this theory there has been a special attention to individual factors and its effects on foreign policy. The main question is raised in this study would be how are the effects of Islamic Republic of Iran foreign policy approaches between 1997 till 2013. The authors believe during these years Islamic republic if Iran foreign policy has adopted two different approaches, an increasing tension approach and an aggressive invasive policy due to lack of an exact strategy in dealing with international system. At last the study results the individual factors and personality type of two previous presidents of Iran, Mr. Khatami and Mr. Ahmainejad has a great affect on Islamic republic position in international system. As we could observe at the first period we witnessed an increasing role in international system that ends with getting substantial benefits and in the second period we could obviously see the decrease of this position and isolation of the country in international system.
Highlights
Foreign policy in international relations arena is a link between government’s internal activities and global environment
The authors believe during these years Islamic republic if Iran foreign policy has adopted two different approaches, an increasing tension approach and an aggressive invasive policy due to lack of an exact strategy in dealing with international system
As we could observe at the first period we witnessed an increasing role in international system that ends with getting substantial benefits and in the second period we could obviously see the decrease of this position and isolation of the country in international system
Summary
Foreign policy in international relations arena is a link between government’s internal activities and global environment. The difference is in exclusive and monopolistic view of governments for adoption and application of fundamental believes This is against with new ways of ruling which in a great extent gets benefit of brainstorming procedures. The reason as we mentioned before may be in methods of foreign policy principles understandings and actions of each government in Islamic republic and developing them by risk-taking and risk avert approaches and their derivations which we are going to deal with it later in this text. The country’s policy switched to be risk-taking and maximize when Mahmood Ahmadnejad took the control of the government In this period of diplomacy device along with criticism from passive and ineffective manner of previous government tried to reconstruct revolutionary concepts and become an active agent in international arena. We witnessed a contrast and aggressive approach in international system
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
