Abstract

Automation of informal settlements detection using satellite imagery remains a challenging task in urban remote sensing. This is due to the fact that informal settlements vary in shape, size and spatial arrangement from one region to the other in some cases within a city. This paper investigated the methodology to detect informal settlements in a densely populated township by assessing informal settlement indicators observed from very high spatial resolution satellite imagery. We assessed twelve informal settlement indicators to determine the most effective indicators to distinguish between informal and informal classes. These indicators included the spectral indices first and second-order statistical measurements. In addition to the commonly used informal settlement indicators, we assessed the effectiveness of built-up area and iron cover. The GLCM textural measures performed poorly in separating informal and formal settlements compared to first-order statistics measurement and spectral indices. The built-up area index, coastal blue index and the first-order statistics mean measurements produced higher separability distance of informal and formal settlements. The iron index performed better in separating the two settlement types than the commonly used GLCM measure and NDVI. The proposed ruleset that uses the three features with the highest separability distance achieved producer and user accuracies of informal settlements of 95% and 82%, respectively. The results of this study will contribute towards developing methodologies to automatically detect informal settlements.

Highlights

  • More than 58% of the world population lived in urban areas in 2018, and the number is expected to increase to 75% in 2050 [1]

  • This study investigates the performance of twelve image-based indicators on the detection of informal from formal settlements in Mamelodi, in South Africa, using WorldView

  • The results indicate that the selected Gray level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) textural measures ar in distinguishing informal from formal settlements in a densely populated in area

Read more

Summary

Introduction

More than 58% of the world population lived in urban areas in 2018, and the number is expected to increase to 75% in 2050 [1]. The visual image interpretation method is usually applied to very high spatial resolution satellite imagery Even though this methodology is time-consuming and resource-intensive, it is still commonly used as it produces higher accurate results when performed by experienced technicians than automated methodology [20]. Many studies in the literature used object and settlement characteristics to detect informal settlements from satellite imagery with varying accuracy based on the informal settlement indicator and geographic area. Even though several studies have focused on detecting informal settlements in different geographic areas, an automated methodology for informal settlement mapping from remotely sensed data still does not exist. In addition to commonly used informal settlement indicators, the study investigates two informal settlement indicators that can be derived from high-resolution satellite imagery

Study Area
Location
Method
Image Segmentation
Assessment of Informal Settlement Indicators
Detection of Informal Settlements
Theinresults show theshow tha
Informal and Formal Settlements Classification Results
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call