Abstract
This research investigates the difference in indicator of college students' mathematical competence in Integral calculus learning based on gender. The research design was quasiexperiment involving 200 college students. The research instrument was a test of mathematical competency. Value category refers to the Standard Reference. Data were analyzed by the Mann-Whitney U test. The results showed that in the scientific debate strategy for men and women the average value of each indicator in a row were: (1) Concepts understanding were C and B categories; (2) Procedures fluency were A and A; (3) Strategic competencies were B and B; (4) Adaptive reasoning were B and B; (5) Productive disposition were B and B. Gender differences in the scientific debate strategy do not have a significant effect on enhancement of indicator of mathematical competence. In the conventional learning shows: (1) Concepts understanding were C and B; (2) Procedures fluency were C and B; (3) Strategic competencies were D and C; (4) Adaptive reasoning were C and B; (5) Productive disposition were C and B. Gender differences in conventional learning do not have a significant effect on enhancement of concept understanding, strategic competence, and adaptive reasoning. These have a significant influence on the enhancement of procedural fluency and productive disposition.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
