Abstract
ROBO2 gene disruption causes vesicoureteric reflux (VUR) amongst other congenital anomalies. Several VUR patient cohorts have been screened for variants in the ubiquitously expressed transcript, ROBO2b, but, apart from low levels in a few adult tissues, ROBO2a expression is confined to the embryo, and might be more relevant to VUR, a developmental disorder. ROBO2a has an alternative promoter and two alternative exons which replace the first exon of ROBO2b. We screened probands from 251 Irish VUR families for DNA variants in these. The CpG island of ROBO2a, which includes the non-coding first exon, was found to contain a run of six variants abolishing/creating CpG dinucleotides, including a novel variant, present in the VUR cases in one family, that was not present in 592 healthy Irish controls. In three of these positions, the CpG was created by the non-reference allele, and the reference allele was not the nucleotide that would result from spontaneous deamination of methylcytosine to thymine, suggesting that there might have been selection for variability in number of CpGs in this island. This is in marked contrast to the CpG island at the start of ROBO2b, which only contained a single variant that abolishes a CpG.
Highlights
ROBO2 is one of at least twenty genes implicated in non-syndromic vesicoureteric reflux (VUR), though the majority of genetic aetiology of VUR is still unknown
Variation of its specific starting exons and upstream sequence have not previously been reported in VUR patients, and we find an interesting difference compared with the start of ROBO2b which may be of interest beyond the topic of VUR
The genotypes and haplotype derivations of all four individuals are shown in Supplementary Table S2. This is the first report of investigation of the alternative exons and alternative promoter specific to the ROBO2a isoform in a group of patients
Summary
ROBO2 is one of at least twenty genes implicated in non-syndromic vesicoureteric reflux (VUR), though the majority of genetic aetiology of VUR is still unknown. The three genome browsers all differ in numbers and details of ROBO2 transcripts and have changed their displays several times during the work reported here It seems that there may be over 30 different coding transcripts, as well as several non-coding ones, and possibly as many as ten different starting sites. Variation of its specific starting exons and upstream sequence have not previously been reported in VUR patients, and we find an interesting difference compared with the start of ROBO2b which may be of interest beyond the topic of VUR. This investigation was complicated by the presence of non-coding copies of the ROBO2a exons on Chromosomes 20 and 22
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.