Abstract

Assessing the future effects of climate change on water availability requires an understanding of how precipitation and evapotranspiration rates will respond to changes in atmospheric forcing. Use of simplified hydrological models is required beacause of lack of meteorological forcings with the high space and time resolutions required to model hydrological processes in mountains river basins, and the necessity of reducing the computational costs. The main objective of this study was to quantify the differences between a simplified hydrological model, which uses only precipitation and temperature to compute the hydrological balance when simulating the impact of climate change, and an enhanced version of the model, which solves the energy balance to compute the actual evapotranspiration. For the meteorological forcing of future scenario, at-site bias-corrected time series based on two regional climate models were used. A quantile-based error-correction approach was used to downscale the regional climate model simulations to a point scale and to reduce its error characteristics. The study shows that a simple temperature-based approach for computing the evapotranspiration is sufficiently accurate for performing hydrological impact investigations of climate change for the Alpine river basin which was studied.

Highlights

  • According to the Fifth Assessment Report (AR5) of the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) [1], for average annual Northern Hemisphere temperatures, the period 1983–2012 was very likely the warmest 30-year period of the last 800 years

  • The most common approach used to assess the hydrologic impact of global climate change involves climate models as input of hydrological models

  • The climate models simulate the climatic effects of increasing atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases, while the hydrological models are used to simulate the hydrological impacts of climate change [10]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

According to the Fifth Assessment Report (AR5) of the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) [1], for average annual Northern Hemisphere temperatures, the period 1983–2012 was very likely the warmest 30-year period of the last 800 years. The most common approach used to assess the hydrologic impact of global climate change involves climate models as input of hydrological models. The climate models simulate the climatic effects of increasing atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases, while the hydrological models are used to simulate the hydrological impacts of climate change [10]. River discharges, and their temporal distributions, are strongly affected by high mountainous areas [11], [12], which are sensitive to global warming [13], [14]. The quality of hydrological impact investigations, even of larger catchments, depends on the capability to model those specific processes in mountainous regions

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call