Abstract

The mechanisms involved in determining arbovirus vector competence, or the ability of an arbovirus to infect and be transmitted by an arthropod vector, are still incompletely understood. It is well known that vector competence for a particular arbovirus can vary widely among different populations of a mosquito species, which is generally attributed to genetic differences between populations. What is less understood is the considerable variability (up to several logs) that is routinely observed in the virus titer between individual mosquitoes in a single experiment, even in mosquitoes from highly inbred lines. This extreme degree of variation in the virus titer between individual mosquitoes has been largely ignored in past studies. We investigated which biological factors can affect titer variation between individual mosquitoes of a laboratory strain of Aedes aegypti, the Orlando strain, after Sindbis virus infection. Greater titer variation was observed after oral versus intrathoracic infection, suggesting that the midgut barrier contributes to titer variability. Among the other factors tested, only the length of the incubation period affected the degree of titer variability, while virus strain, mosquito strain, mosquito age, mosquito weight, amount of blood ingested, and virus concentration in the blood meal had no discernible effect. We also observed differences in culture adaptability and in the ability to orally infect mosquitoes between virus populations obtained from low and high titer mosquitoes, suggesting that founder effects may affect the virus titer in individual mosquitoes, although other explanations also remain possible.

Highlights

  • Arboviral diseases account for approximately 17% of all infectious diseases globally and approximately 40,000 deaths each year, making them a great public health concern [1].Arboviruses of medical importance include chikungunya virus, dengue virus (DENV), Zika virus, West Nile virus, yellow fever virus, Sindbis virus (SINV), and many others [1].SINV is classified as an emerging pathogen that is mainly reported in northern Europe and southern Africa [2]

  • To determine the effect of midgut infection on variation in the titer, Orlando mosquitoes were either allowed to feed on a blood meal containing 1.1 × 109 PFU/mL or were injected with 10 PFU of passage 2 (P2) virus derived from an infectious clone of the MRE-16 strain of SINV, and the virus titer in whole mosquitoes was determined by TCID50 assay at 5 days after virus exposure

  • To begin to explore what biological factors contribute to variation in the arbovirus titer between individual mosquitoes after oral infection, we used SINV as a model organism to study titer variation in a laboratory strain of Ae. aegypti

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Arboviral diseases account for approximately 17% of all infectious diseases globally and approximately 40,000 deaths each year, making them a great public health concern [1].Arboviruses of medical importance include chikungunya virus, dengue virus (DENV), Zika virus, West Nile virus, yellow fever virus, Sindbis virus (SINV), and many others [1].SINV is classified as an emerging pathogen that is mainly reported in northern Europe and southern Africa [2]. Arboviral diseases account for approximately 17% of all infectious diseases globally and approximately 40,000 deaths each year, making them a great public health concern [1]. Arboviruses of medical importance include chikungunya virus, dengue virus (DENV), Zika virus, West Nile virus, yellow fever virus, Sindbis virus (SINV), and many others [1]. SINV is classified as an emerging pathogen that is mainly reported in northern Europe and southern Africa [2]. In Sweden, disease caused by SINV infection in humans is called. Ockelbo disease, which is characterized by rash, arthritis, and mild fever [3]. Ockelbo disease is not fatal, and most patients recover within weeks or months, but arthralgia and myalgia can persist for years following infection, which suggests an inflammatory response or a persistent infection [3]. The prevalence of SINV infection is mostly low, resulting in short and sporadic epidemics [4]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call