Abstract
Three sets of antibacterial nitrofuran derivatives [set I, 5-R-substituted (Z)-2-(5-nitrofuran-2-ylmethylene)-3(2H)-benzofuranones (R = OCH(3), H, CH(3), C(2)H(5), nC(3)H(7), Cl, Br, CN, and NO(2)) and their 2-hydroxyphenyl and 2-acetoxyphenyl analogues; set II, 5-R-substituted (E)-1-(2-hydroxyphenyl)-3-(5-nitrofuryl)-2-propen-1-ones (R = H, CH(3), C(2)H(5), Cl, and NO(2)); and set III, 5-R-substituted (E)-1-(2-acetoxyphenyl)-3-(5-nitrofuryl)-2-propen-1-ones (R = H, CH(3); C(2)H(5), Cl, and NO(2))] were prepared and tested against a Gram-positive (Staphylococcus aureus, strain ATCC-25923) and a Gram-negative bacterium (Caulobacter crescentus, strain NA 1000). QSAR equations derived for the IC(50) values against both bacteria show negative contributions of two terms: an electronic one, expressed either by sigma, the Hammett substituent constant, or by E, the cyclic voltametric reduction potential. Another term described by an indicator variable, I(abs), is assigned the value of 0 for set I compounds and the value of 1 for sets II and III. No important contribution of the hydrophobic factor was found. For the three sets, the QSAR regressions suggest that the same structural features describe the activities for both bacteria and that, although reduction is a necessary step, it should not be the determining one. These results agree with those found for the QSAR of 5-nitroimidazole analogues.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.