Abstract

BackgroundSocial capital can been described as an individual or a collective attribute, with structural and cognitive components, and a bonding, bridging and linking typology. While extensively studied in the community, studies in occupational settings are sparse by comparison. Furthermore, there is no uniformity in its measurement. This study investigated the construct validity of a Workplace Social Capital questionnaire (WSC), originally developed in the Finnish Public Sector occupational cohort, in a different socio-cultural setting (Cyprus), language (Greek) and occupational group (Registered Nurses). It also explored its criterion concurrent validity according to observed association with self-rated health and psychological distress.MethodsParticipants were 10% of all registered nurses (N = 362) who responded to the 8-item WSC scale during a nationwide educational programme. A unidimensional model was compared with the postulated two-factor (structural vs cognitive) and three-factor model (bonding, bridging, linking) in Confirmatory Factor Analyses. The association with self-rated health (0–100 Visual Analogue Scale) and mental distress (GHQ-12 ≥ 4) was assessed in linear and logistic regression models.ResultsA bonding (Cronbach’s a = 0.76), bridging (a = 0.78) and linking (a = 0.89) structure explained 77.6% of the variance and was a better fit as indicated by goodness of fit indices. Elevated odds of mental distress and poorer self-rated health were observed among participants with the lowest levels of perceived workplace social capital. In adjusted models, associations appeared stronger with bonding social capital (adjOR of mental distress = 2.71 95% CI = 1.08, 6.79) while those with the highest scores rated their health higher by 8.0 points on average (95% CI = 2.1, 13.8). Low linking social capital was also associated with poorer health but no consistent associations were observed with bridging.ConclusionWhile associations appeared stronger with bonding and linking, this may reflect a weakness of the measure to fully capture bridging social capital. Even though, this aspect might need strengthening, the WSC showed good metric properties in a different setting, language and occupational group. Cross-national and cognitive validation studies are needed.

Highlights

  • Social capital can been described as an individual or a collective attribute, with structural and cognitive components, and a bonding, bridging and linking typology

  • Aim This study explored the cross-cultural transferability of the Finnish Public Sector Study (FPSS) Workplace Social Capital (WSC) questionnaire in a different setting (Cyprus), language (Greek) and occupational group

  • Even though associations with poorer self-rated health and higher levels of distress appeared stronger with perceived bonding and linking, rather than bridging social capital, this might reflect a range of measurement issues, or its use in the specific occupational group or setting

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Social capital can been described as an individual or a collective attribute, with structural and cognitive components, and a bonding, bridging and linking typology. This study investigated the construct validity of a Workplace Social Capital questionnaire (WSC), originally developed in the Finnish Public Sector occupational cohort, in a different socio-cultural setting (Cyprus), language (Greek) and occupational group (Registered Nurses). It explored its criterion concurrent validity according to observed association with self-rated health and psychological distress. Studies in several work settings have reported associations between low levels of social capital, either measured at the level of the individual (i.e. perception) and/ or aggregately at the level of the unit (i.e. a contextual characteristic) with low self-rated health [7, 8], depressive symptomatology [9], hypertension [10], health-threatening behaviours [8, 11] and long-term sickness absence [12]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call