Abstract
Cavitation erosion pits and their effects on erosion progression were investigated in detail for SUS 304 stainless steel, α+β brass (60/40), and pure aluminum (Al-99.999 and Al-99.92) by means of vibratory erosion. Two kinds of erosion pits were found on the specimen surfaces, one by microjet impact and the other by shockwave blow. Systematic observations of the feature of microjet-pits with the testing time showed that the sizes and shapes of microjet-pits did not change at all and such pits scarcely played an important role in developing the erosion. Moreover, the feature morphology of eroded surfaces, and dislodged particles and their large sizes revealed that microjet-pits had a limited effect on erosion and that the predominant failure was a fatigue process.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
