Abstract

This paper compares two different delayed detached-eddy simulation (DDES) techniques, namely iDDES and l2-ω-DDES. Their performance is investigated with and without combustion. While iDDES limits the dissipation term of the turbulent kinetic energy equation, l2-ω-DDES confines its production term. In this way, both models achieve that resolved turbulence is enhanced in regions of separated flow. On the other hand, the models show significant differences. In a first step this is investigated using three non-reactive test cases. While here the first-order moments are in a fairly good agreement, the second-order moments exhibit slight differences. Despite the similarities in first- and second-order moments, the instantaneous flow fields differ considerably with the iDDES displaying finer vortex structures. This is caused by different levels of eddy viscosity. These disparities are even more pronounced in case of a laboratory-scale rocket combustion chamber, where strong differences in quantities as the wall heat flux are observed. This clearly demonstrates an impact on the combustion process.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call