Abstract

In vitro generation of dendritic-like cells through differentiation of peripheral blood monocytes is typically done using two-dimensional polystyrene culture plates. In the process of optimising cell culture techniques, engineers have developed fluidic micro-devises usually manufactured in materials other than polystyrene and applying three-dimensional structures more similar to the in vivo environment. Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) is an often used polymer for lab-on-a-chip devices but not much is known about the effect of changing the culture surface material from polystyrene to PDMS. In the present study the differentiation of porcine monocytes to monocyte-derived dendritic cells (moDCs) was investigated using CD172apos pig blood monocytes stimulated with GM-CSF and IL-4. Monocytes were cultured on surfaces made of two- and three-dimensional polystyrene as well as two- and three-dimensional PDMS and carbonised three-dimensional PDMS. Cells cultured conventionally (on two-dimensional polystyrene) differentiated into moDCs as expected. Interestingly, gene expression of a wide range of cytokines, chemokines, and pattern recognition receptors was influenced by culture surface material and architecture. Distinct clustering of cells, based on similar expression patterns of 46 genes of interest, was seen for cells isolated from two- and three-dimensional polystyrene as well as two- and three-dimensional PDMS. Changing the material from polystyrene to PDMS resulted in cells with expression patterns usually associated with macrophage expression (upregulation of CD163 and downregulation of CD1a, FLT3, LAMP3 and BATF3). However, this was purely based on gene expression level, and no functional assays were included in this study which would be necessary in order to classify the cells as being macrophages. When changing to three-dimensional culture the cells became increasingly activated in terms of IL6, IL8, IL10 and CCR5 gene expression. Further stimulation with LPS resulted in a slight increase in the expression of maturation markers (SLA-DRB1, CD86 and CD40) as well as cytokines (IL6, IL8, IL10 and IL23A) but the influence of the surfaces was unchanged. These findings highlights future challenges of combining and comparing data generated from microfluidic cell culture-devices made using alternative materials to data generated using conventional polystyrene plates used by most laboratories today.

Highlights

  • Dendritic cells (DCs) are a heterogenic group of antigen presenting cells important for induction of immunological responses

  • Purified CD172a positive monocytes were cultured with medium containing granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and IL4 on surfaces that differed in material; PS, PDMS or carbonised PDMS, and dimension; 2D or 3D

  • This study aimed at investigating the effect of changing the culture conditions when generating porcine monocyte-derived dendritic cells (moDCs) in vitro

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Dendritic cells (DCs) are a heterogenic group of antigen presenting cells important for induction of immunological responses. It can be difficult to harvest sufficient quantities of DCs for characterization and study, and in vitro generated monocyte-derived dendritic cells (moDCs) have been used as an alternative With this technique peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) are harvested, and monocytes isolated and cultured with growth factors, such as granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and interleukin 4 (IL-4) [2]. With the central role of DCs as immune modulators and with the observation that cancer patients have DCs with reduced capacity to initiate efficient Th1 immune responses [3,4], controlling the differentiation of DCs may result in generation of cells able to activate in vivo immune responses against antigenic targets that otherwise are not recognized as immunogenic. In vitro culture systems for controlled DC maturation, differentiation and immune priming hold promise for activation or deactivation of the immune system against antigenic targets which are inaccessible with current immunization protocols

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call