Abstract
Efforts to implement variational data assimilation routines with functional ecology models and land surface models have been limited, with sequential and Markov chain Monte Carlo data assimilation methods being prevalent. When data assimilation has been used with models of carbon balance, prior or “background” errors (in the initial state and parameter values) and observation errors have largely been treated as independent and uncorrelated. Correlations between background errors have long been known to be a key aspect of data assimilation in numerical weather prediction. More recently, it has been shown that accounting for correlated observation errors in the assimilation algorithm can considerably improve data assimilation results and forecasts. In this paper we implement a Four-dimensional Variational data assimilation (4D-Var) scheme with a simple model of forest carbon balance, for joint parameter and state estimation and assimilate daily observations of Net Ecosystem CO2 Exchange (NEE) taken at the Alice Holt forest CO2 flux site in Hampshire, UK. We then investigate the effect of specifying correlations between parameter and state variables in background error statistics and the effect of specifying correlations in time between observation errors. The idea of including these correlations in time is new and has not been previously explored in carbon balance model data assimilation. In data assimilation, background and observation error statistics are often described by the background error covariance matrix and the observation error covariance matrix. We outline novel methods for creating correlated versions of these matrices, using a set of previously postulated dynamical constraints to include correlations in the background error statistics and a Gaussian correlation function to include time correlations in the observation error statistics. The methods used in this paper will allow the inclusion of time correlations between many different observation types in the assimilation algorithm, meaning that previously neglected information can be accounted for. In our experiments we assimilate a single year of NEE observations and then run a forecast for the next 14 years. We compare the results using our new correlated background and observation error covariance matrices and those using diagonal covariance matrices. We find that using the new correlated matrices reduces the root mean square error in the 14 year forecast of daily NEE by 44% decreasing from 4.22gCm−2day−1 to 2.38gCm−2day−1.
Highlights
In numerical weather prediction data assimilation has been predominately used for state estimation whilst keeping parameters fixed
We present the results of four experiments where we vary the representations of B and Rwhile assimilating the same Net Ecosystem CO2 Exchange (NEE) observations in the window from the beginning of January 1999 to the end of December 1999
We forecast the NEE over 287 the 14 years (Jan 2000 - Dec 2013) and compare with the observed data. Using this shorter analysis window with a long forecast allows us to see the effect of including correlations in the error statistics more clearly, as we have a longer time-series of data with which to judge our forecast after data assimilation
Summary
In numerical weather prediction data assimilation has been predominately used for state estimation whilst keeping parameters fixed. This is because numerical weather prediction is mainly dependent on the initial state with model physics being well understood. Ecosystem carbon cycle models are more dependent on finding the correct set of parameters to describe the ecosystem of interest (Luo et al, 2015) This is possibly why Monte Carlo Markov chain (MCMC) data assimilation methods have been used more with ecosystem carbon cycle models. Smaller ecosystem models are much less computationally ex[28] pensive to run than large numerical weather prediction models, meaning that MCMC methods (requiring many more model runs than variational assimilation methods) are more implemented. Smith et al (2009) show that the prescription of these error statistics and their correlations can have a significant impact on parameter-state estimates obtained from the assimilation
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.