Abstract

To obtain an optimal solution for any Transportation Problem (TP), the first step is to find an Initial Basic Feasible Solution (IBFS). A better IBFS requires fewer iterations to reach an optimal solution. The Least Cost Method (LCM) and Vogel’s Approximate Method (VAM) are commonly used approaches to finding IBFS due to their ease of implementation. Researchers frequently propose various methods to discover IBFS, but most of them are modifications of LCM or VAM. While VAM generally performs better, there are instances where it produces worse results compared to LCM and other approaches. Additionally, although researchers have developed new approaches, mainly modified versions of VAM, and demonstrated improved solutions with a few numerical instances, they have not yet identified the causes behind these results. The reasons for LCM and VAM's inability to obtain better IBFS have not been fully determined. This article aims to uncover the causes of pitfalls and the mechanisms of the allocation flow in both LCM and VAM through hypothetical and experimental domains. Several typical numerical instances have been conducted to demonstrate the causes of pitfalls and the allocation flow mechanisms of these methods. Journal of Engineering Science 14(1), 2023, 123-135

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.