Abstract

The inadequacies of basic physics models for disruption prediction have induced the community to increasingly rely on data mining tools. In the last decade, it has been shown how machine learning predictors can achieve a much better performance than those obtained with manually identified thresholds or empirical descriptions of the plasma stability limits. The main criticisms of these techniques focus therefore on two different but interrelated issues: poor “physics fidelity” and limited interpretability. Insufficient “physics fidelity” refers to the fact that the mathematical models of most data mining tools do not reflect the physics of the underlying phenomena. Moreover, they implement a black box approach to learning, which results in very poor interpretability of their outputs. To overcome or at least mitigate these limitations, a general methodology has been devised and tested, with the objective of combining the predictive capability of machine learning tools with the expression of the operational boundary in terms of traditional equations more suited to understanding the underlying physics. The proposed approach relies on the application of machine learning classifiers (such as Support Vector Machines or Classification Trees) and Symbolic Regression via Genetic Programming directly to experimental databases. The results are very encouraging. The obtained equations of the boundary between the safe and disruptive regions of the operational space present almost the same performance as the machine learning classifiers, based on completely independent learning techniques. Moreover, these models possess significantly better predictive power than traditional representations, such as the Hugill or the beta limit. More importantly, they are realistic and intuitive mathematical formulas, which are well suited to supporting theoretical understanding and to benchmarking empirical models. They can also be deployed easily and efficiently in real-time feedback systems.

Highlights

  • The resulting equation determining the threshold for the occurrence of a disruption is found to be: a aq aρ LM(rc ) = c·IPI ·aaa ·q95 ·li(3)ali ·ρc where LM is the amplitude of the locked mode in mT, c is a constant, ai are regression coefficients, Ip is the plasma current, q95 the safety factor at 95% of the radius, a is the minor radius, li is the internal inductance and ρc is the distance between the plasma centre and the location of the magnetic loops measuring the amplitude of the locked mode

  • It is shown how it is possible to derive reliably an equation for the boundary between safe and disruptive regions of the operational space directly from the classification provided by machine learning tools

  • Regression via Genetic Programming, which proves the further applicability of these techniques compared to previous investigations [29]

Read more

Summary

Disruptions in Tokamaks

Both natural and man-made, can be stable for long times and may look quite resilient but, in reality, they are not immune to catastrophic collapse. In the field of Magnetic Confinement Nuclear Fusion, disruptions are the most striking example of catastrophic failures difficult to predict They are one of the most severe problems to be faced by the Tokamak magnetic configuration in the attempt to design and operate commercial reactors. Lacking solid and detailed theoretical models of disruptions, the development of an operation-based description of Tokamak plasmas aimed at determining the boundaries of the safe space, in terms of physically controllable quantities, has been attempted One of such empirical descriptions of plasma stability is the so-called Hugill diagram, which combines the low q and density limits [3]. Such a plot has very poor predictive and interpretative capability, since the disruptive and safe regions overlap almost completely in this space. This limit is typically represented as a function of the parameter I*li/(aBT), where I is the plasma current, li the internal inductance and a the minor radius

The betaspace limitthe plot for a large database of JET with the ILW covering
Classifiers and Symbolic Regression via Genetic Programming
Support Vector Machines
Classification and Regression Trees
Symbolic Regression via Genetic Programming
Combining SVM and Symbolic Regression
Computational Requirements
Database of JET with the ITER-Like Wall
A Data-Driven Model for JET with the ILW
Method
Deployment of the Proposed Approach in Support to Model Building
Findings
Conclusions and Future Prospects
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call