Abstract
Objectives: It is important to know what patient reported outcome measure (PROM) scores relate to a meaningful change in health status across time. The aim of this study was to investigate the minimally important difference (MID) of the Diabetes Health Profile (DHP-18), EQ-5D and SF-6D in a Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes patient sample. Methods: A longitudinal dataset including a UK community sample of people with Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes was used for the analysis. A combination of anchor and distribution methods was used to investigate the MID. For the anchor based method, a global health change indicator was used if it correlated with the PROM scores at baseline and follow up. To calculate the anchor based MID, the change in PROM score for those reporting no change on the anchor was subtracted from those reporting small change. For the distribution based estimation, the 1 Standard Error of Measurement, 0.5 and 0.33 standard deviation methods were used. Results: The anchor was not correlated with the DHP-18 dimensions so was only used to estimate MID values for the EQ-5D and SF-6D. For the DHP-18, MID estimates for the Psychological Distress domain range from 6.99 to 10.59, the Barriers to Activity domain range from 6.48 to 9.89, and the Disinhibited Eating domain range from 7.52 to 11.39. The EQ-5D estimations range from 0.058 to 0.158, and the SF-6D estimations range from 0.038 to 0.081. The 0.5 SD and 1SEM estimations are of a similar magnitude across the three measures. Conclusions:This study has derived a range of values for each measure that may correspond to an important change in health status. The MID values may guide researchers who are using the measures as part of their assessment of both Type 1 and Type 2 patients with diabetes mellitus.
Highlights
Diabetes Mellitus is a chronic condition with an estimated worldwide prevalence of approximately 284.8 million in 2010 [1]
In this study we have investigated the minimally important difference (MID) of the DHP-18, EQ-5D and SF-6D in a Type 1 and Type 2 community based diabetes sample, and derived a range of values for each measure that may correspond to an important change
The results add to the knowledge base regarding the psychometrics of the DHP-18 and the widely used EQ-5D and SF-6D in diabetes, and what a score on each measure represents
Summary
Diabetes Mellitus is a chronic condition with an estimated worldwide prevalence of approximately 284.8 million in 2010 [1]. Complications of diabetes may include heart disease, stroke and microvascular concerns. The many health problems related to diabetes impact on an individual’s psychological functioning, which is associated with worry about diabetes-related health concerns [2,3], and daily and social activities [4], which are associated with the prevalence of health complications. Impacts on psychological and behavioural functioning and health related quality of life (HRQL) have been shown to increase as disease progression worsens and the level of related complications increases [4]. It is essential to assess functioning and HRQL in diabetes alongside the assessment of related clinical factors
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have