Abstract

In three experiments, participants named target pictures by means of German compound words (e.g., Gartenstuhl–garden chair), each accompanied by two different distractor pictures (e.g., lawn mower and swimming pool). Targets and distractor pictures were semantically related either associatively (garden chair and lawn mower) or by a shared semantic category (garden chair and wardrobe). Within each type of semantic relation, target and distractor pictures either shared morpho-phonological (word-form) information (Gartenstuhl with Gartenzwerg, garden gnome, and Gartenschlauch, garden hose) or not. A condition with two completely unrelated pictures served as baseline. Target naming was facilitated when distractor and target pictures were morpho-phonologically related. This is clear evidence for the activation of word-form information of distractor pictures. Effects were larger for associatively than for categorically related distractors and targets, which constitute evidence for lexical competition. Mere categorical relatedness, in the absence of morpho-phonological overlap, resulted in null effects (Experiments 1 and 2), and only speeded target naming when effects reflect only conceptual, but not lexical processing (Experiment 3). Given that distractor pictures activate their word forms, the data cannot be easily reconciled with discrete serial models. The results fit well with models that allow information to cascade forward from conceptual to word-form levels.

Highlights

  • Reviewed by: Dirk Koester, Bielefeld University, Germany Markus F

  • Participants named target pictures by means of German compound words (e.g., Gartenstuhl–garden chair), each accompanied by two different distractor pictures

  • Distractor pictures that were associatively related to the target picture clearly speeded target naming

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Reviewed by: Dirk Koester, Bielefeld University, Germany Markus F. Target naming was facilitated when distractor and target pictures were morpho-phonologically related. This is clear evidence for the activation of word-form information of distractor pictures. The production of a simple greeting such as “Hi” is the result of series of cognitive processes that precede articulation Processes such as conceptualization, message generation, lexical selection, morpho-phonological processing, phonetic encoding, and monitoring all take place prior to articulation (Dell, 1986; Butterworth, 1989; Levelt, 1989; Levelt et al, 1999). The major difference between discrete and fully cascading models concerns the information that is activated at certain processing stages, which are detailed below

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call