Abstract

E 551, also known as synthetic amorphous silica (SAS), is the second most produced food additive. However, according to the re-evaluation of E 551 by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) in 2018, the amount of available data on the oral toxicity of food grade E 551 is still insufficient for reliable risk assessment. To close this gap, this study aimed to investigate six food-grade SAS with distinct physicochemical properties on their interaction with the intestinal barrier using advanced in vitro intestinal co-cultures and to identify potential structure–activity relationships. A mucus-secreting Caco-2/HT-29/Raji co-culture model was treated with up to 50 µg/ml SAS for 48 h, which represents a dose range relevant to dietary exposure. No effects on cell viability, barrier integrity, microvilli function or the release of inflammatory cytokine were detected after acute exposure. Slight biological responses were observed for few SAS materials on iron uptake and gene expression levels of mucin 1 and G-protein coupled receptor 120 (GPR120). There was no clear correlation between SAS properties (single or combined) and the observed biological responses. Overall, this study provides novel insights into the short-term impact of food-relevant SAS with distinct characteristics on the intestinal epithelium including a range of intestine-specific functional endpoints. In addition, it highlights the importance of using advanced intestinal co-cultures embracing relevant cell types as well as a protective mucus barrier to achieve a comprehensive understanding of the biological response of food additives at the intestinal barrier in vitro.

Highlights

  • IntroductionThe European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has re-evaluated many food additives (EFSA, 2015, 2016a, b, c, d, 2017a, b, 2018a, b)

  • Over the last years, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has re-evaluated many food additives (EFSA, 2015, 2016a, b, c, d, 2017a, b, 2018a, b)

  • To assess the influence of synthetic amorphous silica (SAS) materials on the intestinal barrier in vitro, an advanced human intestinal co-culture model based on Caco-2/HT-29/Raji B cells (Fig. 1) was established and carefully characterized (Fig S1)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has re-evaluated many food additives (EFSA, 2015, 2016a, b, c, d, 2017a, b, 2018a, b). This included synthetic amorphous silica (SAS), which are defined as nanostructured. An in vivo study in rodents indicated that oral exposure to food-grade SAS (E 551) did not induce systemic toxicity or immunotoxicity (Van der Zande et al 2014). It is often difficult to compare different studies and to draw firm conclusions on the safety of food grade SAS as many of these toxicity studies do not specify what type of silica has been used, and even silica materials that

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call