Abstract

Novel chemical entities (NCEs) may be investigated for emetic liability in a range of unpleasant experiments involving retching, vomiting or conditioned taste aversion/food avoidance in sentient animals. We have used a range of compounds with known emetic /aversive properties to examine the possibility of using the social amoeba, Dictyostelium discoideum, for research into identifying and understanding emetic liability, and hence reduce adverse animal experimentation in this area. Twenty eight emetic or taste aversive compounds were employed to investigate the acute (10 min) effect of compounds on Dictyostelium cell behaviour (shape, speed and direction of movement) in a shallow chemotaxic gradient (Dunn chamber). Compound concentrations were chosen based on those previously reported to be emetic or aversive in in vivo studies and results were recorded and quantified by automated image analysis. Dictyostelium cell motility was rapidly and strongly inhibited by four structurally distinct tastants (three bitter tasting compounds - denatonium benzoate, quinine hydrochloride, phenylthiourea, and the pungent constituent of chilli peppers - capsaicin). In addition, stomach irritants (copper chloride and copper sulphate), and a phosphodiesterase IV inhibitor also rapidly blocked movement. A concentration-dependant relationship was established for five of these compounds, showing potency of inhibition as capsaicin (IC50 = 11.9±4.0 µM) > quinine hydrochloride (IC50 = 44.3±6.8 µM) > denatonium benzoate (IC50 = 129±4 µM) > phenylthiourea (IC50 = 366±5 µM) > copper sulphate (IC50 = 1433±3 µM). In contrast, 21 compounds within the cytotoxic and receptor agonist/antagonist classes did not affect cell behaviour. Further analysis of bitter and pungent compounds showed that the effect on cell behaviour was reversible and not cytotoxic, suggesting an uncharacterised molecular mechanism of action for these compounds. These results therefore demonstrate that Dictyostelium has potential as a non-sentient model in the analysis of the molecular effects of tastants, although it has limited utility in identification of emetic agents in general.

Highlights

  • Emetic research employs a range of animal models, either to identify the emetic liability of a novel chemical entity (NCE) or to characterise mechanisms giving rise to emesis [1]

  • Dictyostelium cell behaviour was monitored by time lapse photography every 6 seconds over a 15 min period (Figure 1) within a chemotactic gradient

  • We investigated the concentration-dependence of this effect for denatonium benzoate, phenylthiourea, quinine hydrochloride, copper sulphate and capsaicin

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Emetic research employs a range of animal models, either to identify the emetic liability of a novel chemical entity (NCE) or to characterise mechanisms giving rise to emesis [1]. To reduce the number of animals needed for these adverse tests, Holmes et al [5] suggested a tiered approach to identify potential emetic liability of NCEs early in compound optimisation In this approach, a series of individual assays would be performed in order to reduce the final number of compounds tested on sentient models. Tissue culture experiments would be employed using mammalian cell lines to predict emetic liability, and animal models would be incorporated This approach could substantially reduce the number of animal experiments by excluding many compounds with potential emetic liability at an earlier stage. This tiered approach requires development of a simple non-sentient model system capable of identifying emetic liability of compounds in a high-throughput type screen

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call