Abstract

Commercial passivated emitter and rear cell (PERC) devices are critically hindered by a thus-far unidentified degradation mechanism called light- and elevated temperature-induced degradation (LeTID). In contrast to PERC devices, aluminum back-surface field (Al-BSF) devices are markedly more resistant to the same degradation mechanism. In this work, we employ device simulations to elucidate the differences between Al-BSF and PERC degradation behavior and thus accelerate the search for the root cause of LeTID. We find that a difference in defect activation under degradation conditions is a more likely explanation than enhanced sensitivity to bulk lifetime for PERC compared to Al-BSF devices. By employing device simulation for the two architectures under high illumination intensity, we identify a narrow parameter space for the LeTID defect precursor. When combined with experimental observations, this may yield important new information about LeTID defect formation.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.