Abstract
Annual imaging observations of Jupiter from 2015 onward by the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) Wide Field Camera 3 (WFC3) as part of the Outer Planet Atmospheres Legacy (OPAL) program (Simon et al., 2015) have provided a valuable data set from which Jupiter’s temporal variability can be characterized and modeled. Spectral samples at discrete filter bands from the UV to short near-IR wavelengths also provide an opportunity to connect temporal changes in reflectivity with temporal changes in cloud structure. To improve constraints on that cloud structure we used center-to-limb variations that were noise-reduced by rotational averaging during each annual OPAL observation sequence. Fitting observations at multiple and distinctly different observer zenith angles helps to make up for the lack of multiple methane-band filters in discerning the vertical distribution of aerosols. The short-wavelength limit of the OPAL observations also provides better constraints than ground-based observation on the properties of Jupiter’s chromophore, i.e., the compound that creates Jupiter’s variety of red colorations to clouds and hazes composed mainly of colorless condensates. We chose four latitudes to investigate with radiative transfer models based on a simple 3-layer aerosol structure consisting of a deep putative NH3 cloud layer, with a physically thin chromophore layer that has a fitted location at or near the top of the deep cloud, and an overlying stratospheric haze layer. Our chosen planetocentric latitudes were 5.5°S (Equatorial Zone South,EZS), 0° (Equatorial Zone, EZ), 10°N (North Equatorial Belt, NEB), and 21.75°N (North Temperate Belt, NTB). Two major color transformations occurred during the 2015–2020 period we analyzed. One is a dramatic dimming of the center of the Equatorial Zone at short wavelengths, especially after 2017, and a significant reddening of that region. The second is a significant reddening of part of the North Temperate Belt (near 22°N) between 2016 and 2017. Both reddening events can be modeled by doubling of the optical depth of the chromophore layer during the transitions. Comparison with prior 2017 model results for the NEB, EZ, and NTB have revealed agreement with Braude et al. (2020) on the vertical location of the chromophore layer but disagreements on cloud-top pressures and the vertical distribution of stratospheric haze particles. We identified what seems to be common tendency of models based on HST/WFC3 observations to either infer very little stratospheric haze opacity or to put that opacity at too high a pressure.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.