Abstract

The concept of ecosystem services is increasingly important for measuring both tangible and intangible benefits that humans obtain from ecosystems. Much research on ecosystem services focused on more tangible services. Intangible cultural ecosystem services, such as sense of place, are often neglected, but in the context of highly populated, increasingly urbanized countries, maintenance of cultural ecosystem services is an important policy objective. One of the challenges of integrating sense of place into the framework of ecosystem services is that it is not linked to abstract notions of ecosystems, but tied to perceived landscape features such as mountains, or rivers. In this study, we used free listings and interviews with visitors to investigate perceived landscape features and sense of place through the lens of language in five different landscape types in Switzerland. Within each landscape type, we selected two study sites to quantitatively and qualitatively compare landscape descriptions. Using text processing, we show that terms for landscape features were more similar within the same landscape type, suggesting that people perceive differences between these landscapes that they express in language. However, in general, elicited concepts related to sense of place were similar across landscape types. Thus, our results show that we can use free-listing descriptions to distinguish landscape types, but we found limited differences in the language used to describe sense of place. Our findings offer insights into exploring sense of place in different landscapes and contribute to ongoing efforts for refining the definitions and standardizing assessments of cultural ecosystem services.

Highlights

  • Ecosystems are essential for human well-being through the benefits that people derive, directly or indirectly, from ecosystem functions (Costanza et al, 1997)

  • How are different landscapes described by visitors in situ and to what extent is sense of place expressed in these descriptions?

  • In the first part of the results section, we describe the results from the free listing task, focusing on cognitively salient landscape terms and comparing landscape descriptions with text processing

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Ecosystems are essential for human well-being through the benefits that people derive, directly or indirectly, from ecosystem functions (Costanza et al, 1997). In the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, for instance, ten cultural services are defined, of which only three were assessed (spiritual values, aesthetic values, and recreation), while the other seven (including sense of place) were not (MA, 2005). To situate our own research within the broader theoretical debate, we introduce concepts and approaches that have been applied for studying people-place relations. There has been much debate about definitions and concepts of how people relate to place (Altman & Low, 1992; Droseltis & Vignoles, 2010; Hidalgo & Hernández, 2001; Jorgensen & Stedman, 2001; Kyle, Graefe, & Manning, 2005; Lewicka, 2011; Manzo, 2003; Proshansky, Fabian, & Kaminoff, 1983; Williams, 2014; Williams & Vaske, 2003). Four major concepts recur in this body of literature: place identity, place dependence, place attachment, and sense of place, which we briefly introduce in the following

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call