Abstract

Humans are strongly affected by social exclusion, a multifaceted and complex phenomenon of social life. However, individuals tend to respond differently depending on a multitude of individual and contextual factors. Firstly, with a view to increasing the ecological validity and experimental control of an exclusion manipulation in the laboratory setting, we made use of immersive virtual environment technology (IVET; an Oculus Rift Virtual Reality headset) to create a new exclusion paradigm. Secondly, given that a recent meta-analytic report on reflexive responses (i.e., affect and physiology) to manipulations of exclusion in the laboratory setting cites inconsistencies across findings (Blackhart et al., 2009), we focused on the form of exclusion manipulated to illustrate how this factor may help to explain the divergences in responses. We thus investigated how explicit and implicit forms of social exclusion may have a differential impact on self-reported affect, as well as on electrodermal and cardiovascular activity. Results from this laboratory study conducted with a varied sample of the local population made salient the affordances of IVET as a tool in exclusion research. They also helped to reconcile the conflicting findings in the literature relating to differences in the level of negative affect generated and shed light on physiological arousal in the wake of being excluded in different ways.

Highlights

  • Social exclusion is ubiquitous to human experience

  • While much research on social exclusion, when treated as a generalized phenomenon, has been informative, there has been a vast array of differing and often opposing responses recorded in the experimental setting that we show may be primarily due to the lack of specification of the exclusionary event and how this is modeled in the data

  • Relationships between the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) dimensions of fantasy and perspective taking and level of immersion in the immersive virtual environment (IVE) differed as a function of the form of exclusion experienced, such that fantasy and immersion were only significantly positively correlated in the explicit exclusion condition [r = 0.36, 95% CI (0.06, 0.60), N = 41, p = 0.02], while perspective taking was only positively correlated with immersion in the implicit condition [r = 0.45, 95% CI (0.16, 0.68), N = 39, p = 0.003]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Social exclusion is ubiquitous to human experience. Individuals and groups can be socially excluded in many different ways and contexts throughout a lifetime. As a child, the schoolyard bully tells us that we cannot play with the group, or as an adult, we are left out of a work event, one thing we know is that the hurt runs deep. Much experimental research on social exclusion to date has documented the effects that the threat or experience of social exclusion as a generalized phenomenon can have on the mind and body (Dewall et al, 2009; Smart Richman and Leary, 2009; Richman, 2013; Stenseng et al, 2015; Beekman et al, 2016).

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.