Investigating proficiency using a lift-type transfer support device for effective care: comparison of skilled and unskilled nursing homes

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of the study was to investigate whether the sustained use of the "Hug," a "hugging" type robotic transfer support device, could increase the level of quality of care. Methods The effect of proficiency on using the device was examined in terms of time spent for transfer, ratio of transfers using the device, and range of targets. The results were compared between skilled care facilities that had used the device for >24 months and unskilled facilities. Results The time spent for transfer at the unskilled facility was 4.6 min (2nd week after introduction), was reduced to 3.0 min (5th week), and 1.5 min at the skilled facility. The usage ratio at the unskilled facility was 13% and 30% (2nd and 5th week, respectively), while it was 97% in the skilled facility. Further, we identified wider in the range of target care recipients in the skilled facility. Conclusion It takes time to master the use of Hug; however, its use was associated with many positive aspects, especially from the perspective of care recipients, e.g., better care, use of their own legs, and reduced time for transfers. These findings suggest that the widespread use of Hug would improve the quality of care. IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION Less physically burdened on the caregivers using Hug, they can afford to talk to the care recipients. Using recipient’s own legs during transfers, it prevents leg muscle disuse. As reduced time for transfers, recipients will have more opportunities to get out of bed.