Abstract

Assisting individuals to stand up from a chair, or sit-to-stand (STS), is a physically demanding task restricted by manual handling regulations. If a hoist was able to produce a normal STS movement pattern this would offer a safe option for both therapist and patient, satisfying both therapeutic and manual handling criteria. Twenty-two healthy subjects participated in the study. Each subject completed STS with and without hoist assistance. Two hoists were used: the Sara 3000 and the Encore. The STS movements were captured on digital camera and the knee and trunk angles were calculated at point of seat-off for unassisted STS, Sara 3000 STS and Encore STS. Data were analysed using a repeated measures ANOVA. Trunk angles during STS using both hoists were found to be different (P < 0.001) from that seen during normal STS. Knee angles measured when using the Sara 3000 hoist were different to those seen during unassisted (or normal) STS; however, knee angles at seat-off for the Encore hoist were similar to those seen during normal STS. This study analysed the movement patterns re-created by two hoists used in the clinical setting. Results showed that the Encore hoist is effective at re-creating normal knee angles at seat-off during the STS transfer, however, neither hoist is able to encourage the required normal trunk angle for independent STS.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call