Abstract

Abstract. We address the inverse problem of inferring the basal geothermal heat flux from surface velocity observations using a steady-state thermomechanically coupled nonlinear Stokes ice flow model. This is a challenging inverse problem since the map from basal heat flux to surface velocity observables is indirect: the heat flux is a boundary condition for the thermal advection–diffusion equation, which couples to the nonlinear Stokes ice flow equations; together they determine the surface ice flow velocity. This multiphysics inverse problem is formulated as a nonlinear least-squares optimization problem with a cost functional that includes the data misfit between surface velocity observations and model predictions. A Tikhonov regularization term is added to render the problem well posed. We derive adjoint-based gradient and Hessian expressions for the resulting partial differential equation (PDE)-constrained optimization problem and propose an inexact Newton method for its solution. As a consequence of the Petrov–Galerkin discretization of the energy equation, we show that discretization and differentiation do not commute; that is, the order in which we discretize the cost functional and differentiate it affects the correctness of the gradient. Using two- and three-dimensional model problems, we study the prospects for and limitations of the inference of the geothermal heat flux field from surface velocity observations. The results show that the reconstruction improves as the noise level in the observations decreases and that short-wavelength variations in the geothermal heat flux are difficult to recover. We analyze the ill-posedness of the inverse problem as a function of the number of observations by examining the spectrum of the Hessian of the cost functional. Motivated by the popularity of operator-split or staggered solvers for forward multiphysics problems – i.e., those that drop two-way coupling terms to yield a one-way coupled forward Jacobian – we study the effect on the inversion of a one-way coupling of the adjoint energy and Stokes equations. We show that taking such a one-way coupled approach for the adjoint equations can lead to an incorrect gradient and premature termination of optimization iterations. This is due to loss of a descent direction stemming from inconsistency of the gradient with the contours of the cost functional. Nevertheless, one may still obtain a reasonable approximate inverse solution particularly if important features of the reconstructed solution emerge early in optimization iterations, before the premature termination.

Highlights

  • We consider the following inverse problem: to infer the unknown basal geothermal heat flux field given surface velocity observations and a non-Newtonian full Stokes ice sheet flow model governed by thermomechanically coupled mass, mo

  • The main aim of this paper is to present an efficient method for solving this large-scale coupled-physics inverse problem and to use model problems to study the prospects for, and limitations of, inferring the geothermal heat flux from surface ice velocities

  • To analyze prospects and limitations of the inversion, we investigate the spectrum of the Hessian of the data misfit part of the cost functional, which provides information about directions in parameter space that can be recovered from observations

Read more

Summary

Introduction

We consider the following inverse problem: to infer the unknown basal geothermal heat flux field given surface velocity observations and a non-Newtonian full Stokes ice sheet flow model governed by thermomechanically coupled mass, mo-. The main aim of this paper is to present an efficient method for solving this large-scale coupled-physics inverse problem and to use model problems to study the prospects for, and limitations of, inferring the geothermal heat flux from surface ice velocities. Despite a gradient that has been computed from an incorrect adjoint equation, and early termination of optimization iterations, one might still obtain a reasonable approximation of the correct inverse solution To illustrate these issues in the context of a thermomechanically coupled ice sheet inverse problem, we neglect certain coupling terms in the Jacobian (as might be done in a forward solver), leading to an incorrect adjoint operator.

The forward problem
The inverse problem
Solution of the inverse problem via an adjoint-based inexact Newton method
Discretization
Optimize-then-discretize versus discretize-then-optimize
Numerical results and discussion
Two-dimensional model problem
Inversion for heat flux containing long- and short-wavelength variations
Inversion for different SNR and different
Influence of the number of observations and the mesh resolution
Three-dimensional model problem
Fully coupled versus one-way coupled approaches in multiphysics inversion
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call