Abstract

Several risk factors for severe non-proliferative and proliferative retinopathy in type 1 diabetes mellitus have been proposed without explaining the rapid progression of retinopathy in some patients. Since GAD65 autoantibodies (GAD65Abs) are detected against glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD), which is mainly expressed in islets and nervous tissue in type 1 diabetic patients, the aim of the present investigation was to test the hypothesis whether GAD65Abs are associated with rapidly progressing severe retinopathy. Patients with severe non-proliferative or proliferative retinopathy ( n=27) were compared with another group, which in spite of long diabetes duration had no or only mild signs of retinopathy ( n=28). GAD65Abs were analysed in a radioimmunoassay using in vitro translated human GAD65, and the levels were expressed as an index in relation to positive and negative reference samples. Using a cut-off level representing the 99th percentile of normals, 6/27 (22%) with and 9/28 (32%) without severe retinopathy were considered GAD65Ab positive. Although there was no difference in the number of GAD65Ab positive patients, the GAD65Ab levels were lower in patients with (0.30; 0.11–0.64) than without (0.68; 0.34–1.12) severe retinopathy ( P=0.03). The patients were also subjected to HLA-DR and DQ typing by PCR and hybridization with oligospecific probes. DQ2/8 was more common in patients with (56%) than without (29%) severe retinopathy ( P=0.05), but DQ2/8 could not account for the lower GAD65Ab levels in patients with severe retinopathy. It is concluded that GAD65Ab levels are inversely correlated with severe retinopathy in young type 1 diabetic patients.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.